Suppose
a man enters into marriage with a woman, but she does not please him
because he finds something objectionable about her, and so he writes
her a certificate of divorce, puts it in her hand, and sends her out
of his house; she then leaves his house and goes off to become
another man’s wife.1
Then suppose the second man dislikes her, writes her a bill of
divorce, puts it in her hand, and sends her out of his house (or the
second man who married her dies); her first husband, who sent her
away, is not permitted to take her again to be his wife after she has
been defiled;2
for that would be abhorrent3
to the Lord, and you shall not bring guilt on the land that the Lord
your God is giving you as a possession.
1 To this point it appears to only be saying something true about the culture. However, there is no effort made to condemn it, as Jesus will late do.
1 To this point it appears to only be saying something true about the culture. However, there is no effort made to condemn it, as Jesus will late do.
2
Now she has been “defiled”, simply for having accepted a second
marriage, or having been subjected to a second divorce? What about
the man?
3
“abhorrent” (and the following “guilt”) are very hard to
explain.
Take-home: The process of divorce is implicitly sanctioned and institutionalized, and kept strongly within the man's authority. Remarriage of a previously divorced couple is prohibited, possibly to prohibit frivolous repeat separations.
No comments:
Post a Comment